[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#26925: Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentatio

From: Jean-Christophe Helary
Subject: bug#26925: Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentation
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 08:45:47 +0900

> On 2017/06/03, at 23:46, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>
>> Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 22:50:55 +0900
>> Cc: address@hidden,
>> address@hidden
>>>> -If the optional argument @var{trim}
>>>> →
>>>> +If @var{trim}
>>>> just to adapt the text to the description of the other arguments.
>>> Thanks, but I see no problem with the current text.  We use both
>>> styles intermittently.
>> It's up to you. I thought it was weird that all the other optional arguments 
>> were not labeled as "optional" and only this one.
> That's not what I see: grepping the ELisp manual for "optional
> argument" comes up with more than 200 hits.  It's quite normal to use
> that.

I am talking about this function. This function does not use "optional 
arguments" for its other optional arguments.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]