[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#27238: 24.5; Rename `face-spec-set-2' and give it a better doc strin

From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#27238: 24.5; Rename `face-spec-set-2' and give it a better doc string
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 18:24:20 +0300

> Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 22:44:40 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Drew Adams <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> > > (face-spec-set-2 TARGET-FACE
> > >                  FRAME
> > >                  (face-spec-choose
> > >                    (get SOURCE-FACE 'face-defface-spec)
> > >                    FRAME))
> > 
> > Why can't you do this by calling a higher-level function?
> What higher-level function would you suggest?

face-spec-recalc and face-spec-set come to mind, for example.

> How would _you_ set one face (`fringe' or whatever), in
> only a given frame, to the spec of another face (or to
> a spec that isn't yet used for any face)?

I asked whether the higher-level functions can do the job.  If they
cannot, please explain why, and please provide specific details about
the difficulties.  Answering my question by another question doesn't
help, since I'm sure I don't know enough about the job you wanted to

> But perhaps you have some other higher-level function in
> mind to do this job?  If so, I wonder why `face-set-recalc'
> doesn't use it, instead of `face-spec-set-2.

There are many documented functions that set face attributes in
various forms and for various sets of frames.  My question is
precisely whether any of them can do this job.  If not, perhaps we
could extend one of them to support whatever you need to do.  That'd
be an alternative to renaming face-spec-set-2 and making it public.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]