[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#26925: Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentatio

From: Jean-Christophe Helary
Subject: bug#26925: Improve /doc/lispref/strings.texi (split-string) documentation
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 06:24:18 +0900

> 2017/06/06 0:09、Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>のメール:
> In general, yes.  But it isn't a mechanical replacement.

Reading the strings, I had already figured that out :)

I'll keep in mind your comment below when I work. And I'll stop using this 
thread for this issue.


> For
> starters, functions which get optional arguments from the prefix arg
> don't need to state explicitly that this argument is optional, since
> the reference to the prefix argument already does that.  Some strings
> say "nil or omitted", which is good enough.  And in some cases
> inserting "optional" would require more thorough rewrite of the doc
> string, because the current style doesn't allow a simple insertion.
> Thanks in advance for working on this.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]