|
From: | Tino Calancha |
Subject: | bug#27919: 25.2.50; dired + eshell-ls: fallback to external ls fails |
Date: | Fri, 4 Aug 2017 17:34:35 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: | Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) |
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017, John Wiegley wrote:
Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:Why is it desirable to use eshell ls with dired instead of ls-lisp? Maybe it would be better to remove it rather than fix it. (It usually goes well when I suggest this...)I like it more than ls-lisp, and it pays attention to all the same options you can use to configure eshell/ls at the Eshell command-line. If anything, why not get rid of ls-lisp?
I think 'The battle of emulated ls with elisp' is about to start. I read about in a Tolkien book; don't remember who won, though.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |