[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*

From: Mark Oteiza
Subject: bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let*
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 00:14:24 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)

On 01/09/17 at 11:05pm, address@hidden wrote:
Mark Oteiza <address@hidden> writes:

 (and-let* ((x ...)
            (y ...)
            ((x > y)))

I assume you meant (> x y), unless you've managed to somehow squeeze an
infix expression parser into that patch above ;)

Ah yeah, I wish!

I didn't try writing it in the style of if-let*--perhaps if-let* could
be extended and all three macros would learn (EXPR).

Yes, I think it's best if all foo-let* macros interpret the varlist in
the same way.

Alright, I'll look at it.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]