bug#28390: Fwd: bug#28390: 26.0.50; overlays-at actually sorts by increa
bug#28390: Fwd: bug#28390: 26.0.50; overlays-at actually sorts by increating priority
Fri, 8 Sep 2017 20:30:46 +0100
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: João Távora<address@hidden> Date: Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 7:48 PM Subject: Re: bug#28390: 26.0.50; overlays-at actually sorts by increating priority To: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote: > > > > Really? Won't that ripple very paintuflly across the elisp ecosphere? > > I don't think so. I believe this optional argument is used very > rarely. > > > I do agree that it should sort the other way, though. But it's too late > > for that, bugs will be features :-). > > I'm not sure it's too late.
You might be right. Even I overestimated how much I use it in my libs. I don't.
And the few first pages of a github code search for overlays-at don't disprove
you. But they don't prove anything either.
Anyway, your call. I wouldn't do it, what's to gain besides consistency?