[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#10613: 24.0.92; Odd behavior of kill interspersed with suspend: docu
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
bug#10613: 24.0.92; Odd behavior of kill interspersed with suspend: document or change? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Feb 2018 19:32:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) |
tags 10613 notabug
close 10613
quit
Kevin Rodgers <kevin.d.rodgers@gmail.com> writes:
> On 1/26/12 8:21 AM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>> This feels a bit odd, as “suspend” is not a normal command: rather like
>> suspending a computer, I expect that after resuming Emacs, it will be in
>> the same state as when suspended. But this is not the case: if one
>> suspends Emacs after a kill command, then on resumption a further kill
>> will start a new kill-ring entry.
>
> What is abnormal about the suspend-* commands, from Emacs' perspective?
Yeah, emacs-suspend is not abnormal, not documented as abnormal, and I
see no reason to make it abnormal.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- bug#10613: 24.0.92; Odd behavior of kill interspersed with suspend: document or change?,
Noam Postavsky <=