>From b5167407b464a13968af600ac3d09f13d52e6d26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2018 13:52:03 +0000 Subject: * lisp/simple.el (async-shell-command, shell-command): Fix grammar --- lisp/simple.el | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/lisp/simple.el b/lisp/simple.el index e2deceb4c2..b7ad6ebd79 100644 --- a/lisp/simple.el +++ b/lisp/simple.el @@ -3351,15 +3351,15 @@ async-shell-command The output appears in the buffer `*Async Shell Command*'. That buffer is in shell mode. -You can configure `async-shell-command-buffer' to specify what to do in -case when `*Async Shell Command*' buffer is already taken by another +You can configure `async-shell-command-buffer' to specify what to do +when the `*Async Shell Command*' buffer is already taken by another running shell command. To run COMMAND without displaying the output in a window you can configure `display-buffer-alist' to use the action `display-buffer-no-window' for the buffer `*Async Shell Command*'. In Elisp, you will often be better served by calling `start-process' -directly, since it offers more control and does not impose the use of a -shell (with its need to quote arguments)." +directly, since it offers more control and does not impose the use of +a shell (with its need to quote arguments)." (interactive (list (read-shell-command "Async shell command: " nil nil @@ -3428,8 +3428,8 @@ shell-command specifies the value of ERROR-BUFFER. In Elisp, you will often be better served by calling `call-process' or -`start-process' directly, since it offers more control and does not impose -the use of a shell (with its need to quote arguments)." +`start-process' directly, since they offer more control and do not +impose the use of a shell (with its need to quote arguments)." (interactive (list -- 2.15.1