[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#27857: add gnus-mail-avoid-redundancy

From: Robert Pluim
Subject: bug#27857: add gnus-mail-avoid-redundancy
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:30:56 +0200

Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden> writes:

> 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <address@hidden> writes:
>> User receives a mail containing
>>    Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
>> User types
>>  S W runs the command gnus-article-wide-reply-with-original
>>  S W runs the command gnus-summary-wide-reply-with-original
>> which puts the same silly line into the proposed response.
>> Wouldn't it look better just   Cc: address@hidden ?
> Hm...  it would.  Does anybody object to me adding this (and defaulting
> the feature to "on")?

No objection from me, thereʼs zero information loss. Vigorous
applause, more like.

> The proposal is to remove the "name" part of an address in To/Cc etc
> headers if and only if it is identical to the "address" part of an
> address.

Yes. From memory, various versions of outlook were pretty good (bad?)
at generating this kind of header, sometimes with a liberal sprinkling
of ' and/or "


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]