[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#31996: 27.0.50; [w32] while dumping: assertion failed: specpdl_ptr->
bug#31996: 27.0.50; [w32] while dumping: assertion failed: specpdl_ptr->kind == SPECPDL_UNWIND_PTR && specpdl_ptr->unwind_ptr.func == xfree
Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:13:46 +0300
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 15:57:46 -0700
> Cc: address@hidden
> Noam Postavsky wrote:
> > Maybe that kind of trick deserves a code comment?
> I thought about doing that, but it seemed like the maintenance cost of having
> the comment there indefinitely wasn't worth the minor performance benefit (a
> benefit that applies only to typical platforms and when optimization is
> facts that'd also probably need to be in the comment). For what it's worth,
> stuff is now documented in the bug report....
But maybe a comment explaining why the order might matter in general
could be of more value, and require less maintenance.