[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#32629: 26; `buffer-list-update-hook' doc string

From: Drew Adams
Subject: bug#32629: 26; `buffer-list-update-hook' doc string
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 08:00:12 -0700 (PDT)

> > > > The doc string should not list the functions that run the hook.
> > >
> > > Why not?
> >
> > Same reason we don't do that elsewhere (do we?).
> I see no reason for such a stringent consistency.

No, there's no need for a stringent consistency.
That's generally true.

> Of course not.  But in this case doing that makes sense.
> Because it tells one indirectly what changes are considered to "update
> the buffer list".

OK. Thanks for thinking about it.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]