[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Oct 2018 18:01:35 +0300 |
> From: João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 09:47:58 +0100
> Cc: 32986@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> A final question: process input is also considered during the sit-for,
> meaning a filter can throw to an
> enclosing tag and end it prematurely and immediately, right?
You mean, if the only input is from a subprocess? No, I don't think
so. Do you have evidence to the contrary?
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/08
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/09
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/14
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/15
- bug#32986: 27.0.50; unexpected delay in while-no-input + accept-process-output, João Távora, 2018/10/15