bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 11:12:17 +0300

> From: Gemini Lasswell <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:30:29 -0700
> 
> When I run some byte-compiled code which creates some threads, and then,
> while a thread is blocked, interactively evaluate the function which
> was used to create that thread, Emacs has a fatal error or segmentation
> fault when the thread becomes unblocked.

Can you please make a smaller stand-alone test case, which doesn't
require patching Emacs?  That will make it much easier to try
reproducing the problem.

> Thread 7 (Thread 0x7f1cd4dec700 (LWP 21837)):
> #0  terminate_due_to_signal (address@hidden,
>     address@hidden) at emacs.c:369
> #1  0x00000000005a4d99 in die (address@hidden "HASH_TABLE_P (a)",
>     address@hidden "lisp.h", address@hidden) at alloc.c:7094
> #2  0x00000000006122b5 in XHASH_TABLE (a=...) at lisp.h:2241
> #3  exec_byte_code (bytestr=..., vector=..., maxdepth=..., args_template=...,
>     address@hidden, args=<optimized out>,
>     address@hidden <bss_sbrk_buffer+9926040>) at bytecode.c:1403
> #4  0x00000000005cb972 in funcall_lambda (fun=..., address@hidden,
>     arg_vector=0x16eac38 <bss_sbrk_buffer+9926040>,
>     address@hidden <bss_sbrk_buffer+8500664>) at eval.c:3057
> #5  0x00000000005c818b in Ffuncall (address@hidden,
>     address@hidden <bss_sbrk_buffer+8500656>) at eval.c:2870
> #6  0x000000000064443b in invoke_thread_function () at thread.c:684
> #7  0x00000000005c728f in internal_condition_case (
>     address@hidden <invoke_thread_function>, handlers=...,
>     address@hidden(0xc3c0), address@hidden <record_thread_error>)
>     at eval.c:1373
> #8  0x0000000000644dd1 in run_thread (state=0x158ec30 
> <bss_sbrk_buffer+8500624>)

Can you show the Lisp backtrace of this thread?  Also, what is the
offending object 'a' in this frame:

> #2  0x00000000006122b5 in XHASH_TABLE (a=...) at lisp.h:2241

and what was its parent object in the calling frame?

Thanks.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]