[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Oct 2018 21:04:18 +0300 |
> From: Gemini Lasswell <gazally@runbox.com>
> Cc: 33014@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2018 10:17:10 -0700
>
> When eval-region evaluates the defun for erb--benchmark-monitor-func, it
> replaces the symbol's function definition, so it removes that reference
> to the byte-code. AFAIK the only other reference to the byte-code
> is on the stack of Thread 7, which is running the byte-code.
So you are saying that the call to mark_stack inside mark_one_thread
doesn't do its job well enough? AFAIU, it's supposed to scan the
stack of each and every thread, and mark Lisp objects referenced from
those stacks.
How do we know there's a reference to that vector on thread 7's stack?
Could it be that there is no reference at all?
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Gemini Lasswell, 2018/10/11
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/12
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Gemini Lasswell, 2018/10/12
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Andreas Schwab, 2018/10/14
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/15
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Gemini Lasswell, 2018/10/15
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/15
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Gemini Lasswell, 2018/10/16
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/16
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/10/16
- bug#33014: 26.1.50; 27.0.50; Fatal error after re-evaluating a thread's function, Gemini Lasswell, 2018/10/18