[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#34794: 26.1; doc of `read-buffer'

From: Drew Adams
Subject: bug#34794: 26.1; doc of `read-buffer'
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2019 14:34:55 -0800 (PST)

> > > It's not hard to state what the default DEF behavior
> > > is, and then later say that if `read-buffer-function'
> > > is non-nil then the use of the other args is up to it,
> > > i.e., not necessarily as described above.  This is
> > > not unusual for a function that optionally accepts a
> > > function arg as one possibility.
> >
> > Please suggest such a text, because I definitely don't see an easy way
> > of saying that, without triggering more bug reports like this one.
> Didn't do anything about this.  Feel free to reopen if you think the
> bug is not done without that.

You asked me to suggest such a text.  I just spent time
doing so, and detailed several problems.  Then I see
that you already replied to yourself asking me for the
suggestion, saying that you've already closed the bug.

Please reopen the bug and consider my suggestions.  Thx.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]