[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#34974: 27.0.50; Moving article error with duplicate suppression disa
bug#34974: 27.0.50; Moving article error with duplicate suppression disabled
Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:14:02 -0700
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)
On 03/24/19 17:08 PM, Basil L. Contovounesios wrote:
> Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes:
>> "Basil L. Contovounesios" <address@hidden> writes:
>>> With gnus-suppress-duplicates left at its default value of nil, trying
>>> to move an article with 'B m <group>' gives me the following backtrace:
>>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument hash-table-p nil)
>>> remhash("<redacted-message-id>" nil)
>>> funcall-interactively(gnus-summary-move-article nil)
>>> call-interactively(gnus-summary-move-article nil nil)
>>> I'm no expert, and I haven't tried reproducing this with a minimal
>>> config, but I think gnus-summary-move-article should not call
>>> gnus-dup-unsuppress-article when gnus-suppress-duplicates is nil, right?
>>> This issue seems to have been uncovered by the switch to hash-tables in
>>> bug#33653. Previously, gnus-dup-unsuppress-article called unintern,
>>> which would not complain when its second argument gnus-dup-hashtb was
>>> nil, even though it probably should have.
>>> Patch to follow.
>> It looks like the only other call to `gnus-dup-unsuppress-articles' is
>> wrapped in a check for `gnus-suppress-duplicates' -- I suppose it would
>> be enough just to wrap this one as well?
> That is what the proposed patch does. Is it okay to push this to
> : https://debbugs.gnu.org/34973#8
Already done! Our messages keep passing each other...