[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Sep 2019 05:31:38 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:53:23 +0200
>
>
> It's long annoyed med that `C-m' is described thusly by
> describe-bindings:
>
> C-c RET Prefix Command
>
> C-c RET C-c mml-secure-message-encrypt
> C-c RET C-e mml-secure-message-sign-encrypt
> C-c RET C-n mml-unsecure-message
> C-c RET C-p Prefix Command
> C-c RET C-s mml-secure-message-sign
> C-c RET C Prefix Command
> C-c RET P mml-preview
> C-c RET S Prefix Command
> C-c RET b mml-attach-buffer
> C-c RET c Prefix Command
>
> I know that `C-m' and RET is the same key binding, but I also think that
> when this key is used as a prefix key, I don't think anybody has ever
> wanted that to be RET instead of `C-m'.
It's a key you press, so I think it's a Good Thing that we use RET
here.
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/22
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2019/09/23
- bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/09/23