bug#32629: 26; `buffer-list-update-hook' doc string

[Stefan Kangas]

tags 32629 + wontfix
close 32629
thanks

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

>> > > > The doc string should not list the functions that run the hook.
>> > >
>> > > Why not?
>> >
>> > Same reason we don't do that elsewhere (do we?).
>>
>> I see no reason for such a stringent consistency.
>
> No, there's no need for a stringent consistency.
> That's generally true.
>
>> Of course not.  But in this case doing that makes sense.
>> Because it tells one indirectly what changes are considered to "update
>> the buffer list".
>
> OK. Thanks for thinking about it.

The conclusion here was that the doc string is fine as it is.  Closing.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas