bug#3179: Entering Chinese "zero": add U+3007

[Eli Zaretskii]

Ping! Ping!

Kenichi, could you please respond?  TIA.

> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 13:12:56 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stepnem@gmail.com, 3179@debbugs.gnu.org,
>  jidanni@jidanni.org
> 
> Ping!
> 
> Kenichi, could you please respond to this issue?  TIA.
> 
> > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:00:19 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 3179@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org
> > 
> > > From: Štěpán Němec <stepnem@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: 3179@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org
> > > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 14:00:35 +0200
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 12:51:35 +0300
> > > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Ming Hua gave no reasoning, and Štěpán said U+3007 is the standard way
> > > > to write ideographic zero.  But why should we assume the intent here
> > > > was to use the ideographic zero?
> > > 
> > > The intent (to write ideographic zero, not white circle) is quite clear,
> > > because that's what the key "ling2" means in Mandarin. As is usually the
> > > case in Chinese, ling2 can also mean a lot of other things, but white
> > > circle is not one of them.
> > > 
> > > You can check with any Chinese or Japanese input method what suggestion
> > > you get for that key (in Japanese that'd be れい/rei). I, for example,
> > > use fcitx with mozc for Japanese and sunpinyin for Chinese, both of
> > > which do the right thing. (I don't normally use Emacs input methods for
> > > CJK languages, I find quail too limited for those and I suspect the same
> > > will be the case for other serious users, which might also be the reason
> > > for the lack of previous feedback.)
> > > 
> > > That said, by all means, do check with Handa-san, I'm kind of curious
> > > myself.
> > 
> > Thanks, I've CC'ed him.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>