bug#39659: 27.0.60; inappropriate han script definition in char-script-table

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: ynyaaa@gmail.com
> Cc: Kenichi Handa <handa@gnu.org>,  39659@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 18:53:07 +0900
> 
> >> It is better to set values as:
> >>    3200-33FF       cjk-misc
> >>    4DC0-4DFF       cjk-misc
> >>    FE30-FE4F       cjk-misc
> >>    1F200-1F2FF     cjk-misc
> >> 
> >> If enclosed CJK Ideographs should be 'han' script,
> >> enclosed Hanguls should be 'hangul' script,
> >> enclosed Katakana should be 'kana' script,
> >> and enclosed Numbers should be 'symbol' script.
> >
> > Please provide some rationale for the differences, just saying
> > "better" and "should" doesn't explain why you think the changes are
> > for the good.
> >
> > CC'ing Handa-san, who I hope will have some comments on this.
> >
> > Thanks.
> 
> Because they are not han characters.
> I think that combinatorial characters are not han characters,
> and that they are symbolic characters.

So your interpretation of cjk-misc is that they are symbols, not
letters?  I'm asking because I don't really know what is meant by
"cjk-misc", I don't think we have it documented anywhere.