|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | bug#40671: [DOC] modify literal objects |
Date: | Sat, 2 May 2020 02:37:05 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 |
On 02.05.2020 00:46, Paul Eggert wrote:
On 4/30/20 8:03 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote:Could we call them "interned values"? Like "interned strings" in some programming languages."Interned" would imply that we're merely deduplicating objects by hashing their contents, which means modifying one deduplicated object modifies them all. But the problem is bigger than that. There are some objects that one simply should not modify, even if they are not deduplicated.
True. It's just the closest term from other languages I know that I could think of.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |