[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil) |
Date: |
Wed, 06 May 2020 17:03:59 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 06:02:45 -0700
> Cc: 40968@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> Pip Cet <pipcet@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > (apply FUNCTION ARGUMENT &rest ARGUMENTS), I guess. I missed it in the
> > first patch.
>
> Thanks.
>
> FWIW, I still think we should avoid changing the function signature if
> at all possible.
I agree. I also think it isn't enough to check only here and in ELPA:
'apply' is a very popular function, and is used very widely. I won't
be surprised if there were more of these usage cases that would be
broken by such a change in the signature.
Can we instead identify the problematic usage and signal an error?
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/05
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Noam Postavsky, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Pip Cet, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Drew Adams, 2020/05/06
- bug#40968: 28.0.50; (apply nil), Phil Sainty, 2020/05/06