[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#42805: 27.1; cc-mode/syntax/font-lock bug
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
bug#42805: 27.1; cc-mode/syntax/font-lock bug |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:57:18 +0000 |
Hello, Gustavo and Eli.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 19:10:11 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Tavares Cabral <gustavotcabral@gmail.com>
> > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 16:55:40 -0300
> > Cc: bug-cc-mode@gnu.org
> > I have found two related issues. Both are evident in csharp-mode, but
> > can easily be reproduced in c-mode.
I'll answer the second issue now (which is easy) and hopefully get round
to the first one soon.
> > Issue 1 (cc-mode.el):
[ .... ]
> > Issue 2 (maybe syntax.el):
> > When syntax-propertize-function is set (to '(lambda (beg end) nil)',
> > for example), a similar problem occurs if electric-pair-mode (or even
> > smartparens) is enabled. The symptoms started after commit 585fb95739,
> > but I don't know if it is related.
> > Steps to reproduce:
> > 1. Open a .c file;
> > 2. Eval '(setq syntax-propertize-function (lambda (beg end) nil)';
> > 3. Enable electric-pair-mode;
> > 4. Insert/delete empty strings.
This is simple. syntax-propertize-function is utterly incompatible with
CC Mode, and _will_ foul it up. To quote from the Emacs Lisp manual
(recently added text):
*Caution:* When this variable is non-`nil', Emacs removes
`syntax-table' text properties arbitrarily and relies on
`syntax-propertize-function' to reapply them. Thus if this
facility is used at all, the function must apply *all*
`syntax-table' text properties used by the major mode. In
particular, Modes derived from a CC Mode mode must not use this
variable, since CC Mode uses other means to apply and remove these
text properties.
> Alan, could you please take a look? Would it be possible to fix this
> for Emacs 27.2?
I hope so. Are there any firm plans for a release date, yet?
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).