[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Nov 2020 13:22:42 -0800 (PST) |
> > If a file is to be autoloaded then it's up to that
> > file whether it should have `lexical-binding' be t.
>
> Agreed. Does this affect that in any way? I don't see how.
>
> I just replied to a separate email of yours making the above point, so
> I don't understand if you are simply making the same point twice, or if
> this is a separate point.
I just received your other message, well after this one.
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Stefan Kangas, 2020/11/24
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/24
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Stefan Kangas, 2020/11/24
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Drew Adams, 2020/11/24
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/11/25
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/25
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/11/25
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Stefan Monnier, 2020/11/25
- bug#44854: [PATCH] Add lexical-binding cookie to autoload files, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/25