bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#36967: 27.0.50; Duplicate lines in xref output


From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: bug#36967: 27.0.50; Duplicate lines in xref output
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 03:35:19 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0

On 02.12.2020 23:30, Juri Linkov wrote:
I tried to use project-find-regexp more often than rgrep,
but unfortunately xref still has a fundamental flaw:
0. emacs -Q
1. M-x project-find-regexp RET regexp RET
2. The output buffer *xref* contains duplicate lines
     when regexp is found on the same line several times,
     each duplicate output line has separate highlighting
     for every regexp occurrence.

I don't know how "fundamental" it is, but indeed, it's somewhat of
a drawback. Suggestions for improving it (API change and/or implementation
change) are welcome.

Here is the patch that makes the broken

Pretty harsh there.

project-find-regexp usable:

Okay, impressions:

When the line has two matches, the new code only collects the first match. So 'matches' is always an list with one element (or nil).

Upside: repetitions are not shown anymore, but the match highlighting is still applied.

Downside: xref-query-replace-in-results won't work in those cases anymore; it will only replace one match. Because the list only contains one location, and not all of them. And that command is pretty nice to have.

Here's an alternative proposal:

Combine the lines inside the rendering code instead.

So each xref will have a separate location, but then xref--insert-xrefs will see that xref-location-line value repeats across some consecutive locations, and will combine them into single line with some text property magic (basically, copying the summary from one of them, and then applying 'xref-item and 'face properties appropriately). This retains the xref item semantics (as opposed to, say, associating an xref item with multiple locations). And _hopefully_ the replace-related code won't need any changes.

As a bonus, 'n' and 'p' should then automatically change behavior to jump between locations when they are on the same line.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]