[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompat
From: |
Protesilaos Stavrou |
Subject: |
bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible) |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2020 18:05:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On 2020-12-11, 08:16 -0600, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> Taking a step back, why are any themes in "etc/themes" to begin with?
>>
>> This question should have been asked 10 years ago, when we added that
>> place.
>
> I wasn't paying attention 10 years ago, I'm afraid. :-)
>
>> Nowadays I think the question is what's so wrong with that
>> place that would justify moving the files. If there are no serious
>> problems, I'd prefer to keep using that directory for themes.
>
> Right. Well, I don't exactly have a strong opinion either way. But I
> do think that we should be consistent: it would be confusing to have
> some themes in "etc/themes" and some in "lisp/themes".
>
> If we can't move all themes to "lisp/themes" and we don't want to use
> "lisp/themes" just for support files, to my mind the only remaining way
> forward is to add some way to byte-compile (perhaps only some?) files in
> "etc/themes". And then make sure they can be loaded, are installed with
> Emacs, etc.
>
> Does that sound good, or could we do even better here?
>
> Protesilaos, what do you think? Does it sound workable for you?
I am fine with whatever is considered best for Emacs and am willing to
make any changes you may consider necessary.
My intent here is to contribute the latest version which satisfies the
number one feature request I kept receiving: let the themes be
customised uniformly.
--
Protesilaos Stavrou
protesilaos.com
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), (continued)
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Christopher Dimech, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Protesilaos Stavrou, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Christopher Dimech, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Christopher Dimech, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Stefan Kangas, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Christopher Dimech, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Eli Zaretskii, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Christopher Dimech, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible),
Protesilaos Stavrou <=
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Christopher Dimech, 2020/12/11
- bug#45068: [PATCH] 28.0.50; Update Modus themes 1.0.2 (backward-incompatible), Christopher Dimech, 2020/12/11