[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Feb 2021 00:48:46 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Empty lines are clearly trivial, but what other examples of trivial
> lines exist? Should we say "non-empty lines"?
A line with just braces, or parentheses, or just a few operators,
can be taken as trivial.
There is no precise rule here.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace, (continued)
- bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/18
- bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace, Richard Stallman, 2021/02/16
- bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/10
- bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace, Matt Armstrong, 2021/02/10
- bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace, Richard Stallman, 2021/02/11
- bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/11
- bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/11
- bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace,
Richard Stallman <=