[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Apr 2021 22:14:09 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: mattiase@acm.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com,
> stefan@marxist.se, 45198@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org
> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 14:47:34 -0400
>
> >> Normally, this untrusted ELisp code (the one present within
> >> `eval-when-compile` and macros defined within the file) limits itself to
> >> quite simple sexp manipulation, so the sandboxing can be quite
> >> restrictive, disallowing things like user interaction, uses of
> >> subprocesses, or writing to files.
> > How is this different from byte-compiling some code, e.g. one
> > downloaded from some elpa?
>
> The normal way to enable flymake is something like
>
> (add-hook 'emacs-lisp-mode #'flymake-mode)
>
> so the file gets compiled just because you're looking at it.
> That's quite different from an explicit request from the user to compile
> a file.
It is? Sorry, I don't see the difference, not a significant one. If
you are implying that one does something conscious and deliberate
before byte-compiling a file, then one could also remove Flymake from
the hook while at that.
bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode, Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/17
- bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/17
- bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode, Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/17
- bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/17
- bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode, Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/17
- bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode, Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/17
- bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/18
- bug#45198: 28.0.50; Sandbox mode, Stefan Monnier, 2021/04/18