[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple ru
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Apr 2021 17:31:09 +0300 |
> Cc: 48118@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Daniel Mendler <mail@daniel-mendler.de>
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:23:34 +0200
>
> > Why can't you call stop-process from your sentinel function(s) to
> > avoid the problem?
>
> What do you mean? I don't want to stop the processes. I want to have
> them running asynchronously and concurrently and Emacs should receive
> the incoming data of both processes. When I have to stop the processes
> the benefit of running the processes asynchronously is lost.
So let's talk about this in more detail, okay?
First, what does "fairness" mean in this context? Given that there
are multiple simultaneous asynchronous subprocesses that produce
output at different rates and consume CPU at different levels, what
would it mean for Emacs to be "fair"?
Second, suppose we have multiple ripgrep subprocesses running, and
Emacs will somehow read from each one of them in a round-robin
fashion: what and how do you expect the user to do to handle the
results of all those subprocesses simultaneously and "fairly"?
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Daniel Mendler, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Daniel Mendler, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Daniel Mendler, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Daniel Mendler, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Daniel Mendler, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Daniel Mendler, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/04/30
- bug#48118: 27.1; 28; Only first process receives output with multiple running processes, jakanakaevangeli, 2021/04/30