bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#47236: 28.0.50; ebdb-mua-pop-up bad interaction with gnus window con


From: Eric Abrahamsen
Subject: bug#47236: 28.0.50; ebdb-mua-pop-up bad interaction with gnus window configurations
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:20:05 -0700
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:

>>>>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:01:43 -0700, Eric Abrahamsen 
>>>>>> <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> said:
>
>     Eric> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
>     >>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:29:38 -0700, Eric Abrahamsen 
> <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> said:
>     >> 
>     Eric> Do let me know if you've tried the new version (or if you're no 
> longer
>     Eric> using EBDB!), and I will close this out.
>     >> 
>     >> Sorry Eric, Iʼve been a bit busy. Iʼll see if I can get to this this
>     >> weekend.
>
>     Eric> No rush at all! I'd just suspected you weren't using it anymore, in
>     Eric> which case I wouldn't wait :)
>
> Hmm, Iʼve got it working for the summary/article/group configurations,
> but not for message. Iʼm getting
>
>     gnus-configure--frame: Invalid buffer type: ebdb-message
>
> I think this means that you need to add something like the following
> to ebdb-insinuate-mssage
>
>   (when ebdb-message-window-configuration
>     (add-to-list 'gnus-window-to-buffer
>                (cons ebdb-message-window-configuration
>                      (ebdb-message-buffer-name))))

Oh, I thought I had! I think I was gluing together the mail and message
functions in my brain.

> And maybe you need to add an ebdb-mail-window-configuration variable,
> and use that instead of ebdb-message-window-configuration in
> ebdb-insinuate-mail?

I'm not sure that's necessary -- it's a bit weird to have the wrong name
in there if you're using mail-mode, but it would only cause trouble if a
user was using _both_ message-mode and mail-mode, and wanted separate
*EBDB* buffers for each. I think this can safely do double duty.

Thanks for the report, and the chance to clean up some dumb code.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]