bug#42323: [External] : Re: bug#42323: 26.3; Doc string of `seq-map'

[Drew Adams]

> > It is, indeed, pretty obscure.  Like Drew, I wonder -- do we really
> > have to put these implementation details in the doc string at all?
> > Opinions?
> 
> These details are now moved to the bottom of the help screen, below the
> information that is immediately relevant.  Without a major re-design of
> the help screen, I think that's as good as it gets for now:
> ...
> 
> I suggest closing this bug report as fixed in 28.1.

I don't see how what you show fixes the bug in any
sense at all.  If the bug can't be fixed now, or no
one has the energy or motivation to fix it now, that
doesn't change the fact that the bug exists.

It's not fixed, IMO.  Your options, as I see it, are
(1) close as "won't fix" or (2) leave it open, in
hopes that someone, at some time, will find the will
and a way to fix it, and will do so.

My preference is almost always for #2.  Closing bugs
just to close bugs doesn't improve anything (IMO).
But it's your call, not mine.  I just don't agree
that the bug is fixed (based on what you showed), at
all.