[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#50811: [External] : bug#50811: 28.0.50; Misleading Docstring for rea
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#50811: [External] : bug#50811: 28.0.50; Misleading Docstring for read-string function |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2021 15:22:18 +0000 |
> I wasn't part of the discussions when this happened (I think it was
> more than a decade ago), but I think the idea was that users were annoyed
> that (in many cases) they had to remove the default completely before
> being able to type stuff in.
Which is misguided. It's not because someone
designs a particular call to `read-*' poorly
that the function shouldn't allow use of
INITIAL-INPUT. Use it only when that makes
sense. And let users know what the behavior
(interaction) is for the given command.
> That is, with
> (read-string "PROMPT " "This is the very long default")
> you have to delete all that before you can type in "foo", which is what
> you wanted to say. (Or `C-a C-k' is you're an expert.)
As the doctor said, "Just don't do that!"
You can misuse anything. That's not a reason
to have nothing.