bug#51699: 29.0.50; [PATCH] Improve performance of 'file-name-case-insensitive-p' for Tramp files

[Jim Porter]

On 11/9/2021 11:34 AM, Michael Albinus wrote:
> This is obviously fine, so I've pushed this to master. Thanks for the
> improvement!

Thanks for merging!

> > Most Tramp methods have a 'tramp-FOO-file-name-p', and most of *those*
> > take a file name string and dissect it. This is a lot of duplicated
> > effort, so I modified 'tramp-find-foreign-file-name-handler' to pass
> > the dissected file name to any of the functions that support it (this
> > is indicated by an 'accepts-vec' property on the function). This
> > probably warrants some documentation (at least a NEWS entry), but I
> > wanted to be sure the strategy made sense before I wrote any docs.
>
> Yes, this makes sense, and it works in my environment (more regression
> tests running). I don't understand why you need the 'accepts-vec'
> property -- is there any operation left, which is passed to
> `tramp-find-foreign-file-name-handler' and which doesn't accept a VEC,
> after applying your patch? And if yes, couldn't we apply usual error
> handling?

There's `tramp-archive-file-name-p' and `tramp-crypt-file-name-p', which 
both want a string filename. I looked over the implementation for those 
and couldn't figure out an easy way to convert them to take a VEC. Maybe 
it's possible though. I also looked into passing both the string form 
and the vec form as separate arguments, but that turned out to be even 
more complex than this implementation.

In addition, I did it this way to prevent any breakage for third-party 
code that calls `tramp-register-foreign-file-name-handler'. If we change 
`tramp-find-foreign-file-name-handler' to pass a VEC all the time, then 
any code out there that expects a string will break. This is probably 
rare, but I've seen a few examples of people doing stuff like this over 
the years, e.g. 
<https://github.com/thinkiny/emacs.d/blob/master/lisp/tramp-jumper.el>.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by the "usual error handling" though. 
If there's a simpler way to do this, I'm happy to change the 
implementation. So long as we can minimize the number of times 
`tramp-dissect-file-name' is called, it should be possible to get 
similar performance improvements to the current version of my patch.