[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#51930: [External] : Re: bug#51930: 27.2; Buffer-local functions? Buf
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#51930: [External] : Re: bug#51930: 27.2; Buffer-local functions? Buffers specified buffer-locally? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2021 17:12:53 +0000 |
> I think "Functions specified buffer-locally" is an unusual way to say
> "the buffer-local value of window-buffer-change-functions"
To put it mildly. And it _doesn't_ say that,
at all. There's no way to legitimately read
it as saying that.
> -- if indeed that's what it's trying to say.
Yes. It's a question any reader will pose:
What is it trying to say?
> I think rewriting this in a less passive voice
> would be a good idea:
>
> ---
> Functions specified buffer-locally
That has the same problem. A reader asks,
What are they trying to say? What does it
mean for a _function_ to be specified
buffer-locally? Means nothing, so far.