|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | bug#52063: 28.0.60; Confusing presentation of lambda |
Date: | Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:58:02 -0500 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Lars Ingebrigtsen [2021-11-26 16:00:43] wrote: > Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes: >> My objection was to: >> >> (Which would also mean that we'd have to allow `declare' in lambdas, >> which I think we should anyway.) > > You don't think we should allow `declare' in lambdas? It'd allow us to > implement things like "named lambdas" more easily. I object to linking the two issues because one is about the `lambda` expressions in source code and the other is about runtime representation of function values and the two are fundamentally distinct (e.g. most runtime function values are compiled). Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |