[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#55426: [PATCH] Add option to kill a shell buffer when the process en
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
bug#55426: [PATCH] Add option to kill a shell buffer when the process ends |
Date: |
Sun, 15 May 2022 11:06:42 +0000 |
Thank you for your comments, here is an improved version:
>From 7337f6862cdb6954498282b9c9d22f6b2cd3457d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 02:09:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add option to kill a shell buffer when the process ends
* shell.el (shell-kill-buffer-on-quit): Add new option (bug#55426).
(shell): Respect 'shell-kill-buffer-on-quit'.
* NEWS: Mention 'shell-kill-buffer-on-quit'.
---
etc/NEWS | 7 +++++++
lisp/shell.el | 17 +++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/etc/NEWS b/etc/NEWS
index a0164bbf3f..9ef83189dd 100644
--- a/etc/NEWS
+++ b/etc/NEWS
@@ -1544,6 +1544,13 @@ values passed as a single token, such as '-oVALUE' or
'eshell-eval-using-options' macro. See "Defining new built-in
commands" in the "(eshell) Built-ins" node of the Eshell manual.
+** Shell
+
+---
+*** New user option 'shell-kill-buffer-on-exit'
+Enabling this open will automatically kill a *shell* buffer as soon as
+the shell session terminates.
+
** Calc
+++
diff --git a/lisp/shell.el b/lisp/shell.el
index 47887433d9..7000d38255 100644
--- a/lisp/shell.el
+++ b/lisp/shell.el
@@ -331,6 +331,12 @@ shell-has-auto-cd
:group 'shell-directories
:version "28.1")
+(defcustom shell-kill-buffer-on-exit t
+ "Kill a shell buffer after the shell process terminates."
+ :type 'boolean
+ :group 'shell
+ :version "29.1")
+
(defvar shell-mode-map
(let ((map (make-sparse-keymap)))
(define-key map "\C-c\C-f" 'shell-forward-command)
@@ -818,6 +824,17 @@ shell
(with-temp-buffer
(insert-file-contents startfile)
(buffer-string)))))))
+ (when shell-kill-buffer-on-exit
+ (let* ((buffer (current-buffer))
+ (process (get-buffer-process buffer))
+ (sentinel (process-sentinel process)))
+ (set-process-sentinel
+ process
+ (lambda (proc event)
+ (when sentinel
+ (funcall sentinel proc event))
+ (unless (buffer-live-p proc)
+ (kill-buffer buffer))))))
buffer)
;;; Directory tracking
--
2.30.2
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>> Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 08:13:49 +0000
>>
>> The below patch adds an option that has a *shell* buffer automatically
>> killed when a shell process terminates. I find this useful, because it
>> helps to avoid re-activating old shell buffers in the wrong
>> `default-directory'.
>
> Thanks, a few comments below.
>
>> +(defcustom shell-kill-buffer-on-quit t
>
> I think a better name is shell-kill-shell-buffer-on-exit.
>
>> + "Kill shell buffer after the process terminates."
>
> "Kill the shell buffer when the shell process terminates."
^
I replaced this with "a", to avoid confusion as to what specific
shell buffer is meant (not only *shell*, but any shell-mode buffer).
>> + (when shell-kill-buffer-on-quit
>> + (let* ((buffer (current-buffer))
>> + (sentinel (process-sentinel (get-buffer-process buffer))))
>> + (set-process-sentinel
>> + (get-buffer-process (current-buffer))
>> + (lambda (proc event)
>> + (unless (buffer-live-p proc)
>> + (kill-buffer buffer))
>> + (when sentinel
>> + (funcall sentinel proc event))))))
>
> Shouldn't we call the previous sentinel before killing the buffer?
> That sentinel could not be prepared to the buffer being dead.
>
> Also, can you modify the code to call get-buffer-process only once?
>
>> If this patch is merged, perhaps something similar for term could be
>> done too?
>
> I'm not sure, but I don't use term frequently enough for my opinion to
> matter.
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> Cc: 55426@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 11:30:17 +0300
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>>
>> > From: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>
>> > Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 08:13:49 +0000
>> >
>> > The below patch adds an option that has a *shell* buffer automatically
>> > killed when a shell process terminates. I find this useful, because it
>> > helps to avoid re-activating old shell buffers in the wrong
>> > `default-directory'.
>>
>> Thanks, a few comments below.
>
> Oh, and one more: I think this change warrants a NEWS entry.