|
From: | Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: | bug#46982: 28.0.50; after-change-functions in an indirect buffer are not called if the change is done while base buffer is active (and vice versa) |
Date: | Fri, 17 Jun 2022 18:28:23 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> > Cc: yantar92@gmail.com, 46982@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:29:54 -0400 > > Eli Zaretskii [2022-06-17 08:42:33] wrote: > >> It's currently the responsibility of the code that sets up the indirect > >> buffer(s) to setup a `before/after-change-functions` in the base buffer > >> that runs (some of) the `before/after-change-functions` in the indirect > >> buffer(s) where they are needed. > > > > Do you think we should document this caveat in the ELisp manual? > > It might be a good thing to mention somewhere around > `clone-buffer`, yes. I'll see what I can come up with. Thanks.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |