bug#56110: 27+; switching from line-mode to char-mode

[signal3]

On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 9:14 PM Basil L. Contovounesios <contovob@tcd.ie> wrote:
<snip>
> In any case, my vote is for correct and simpler code over a smaller
> diff.

Lol, correct is definitely better! Smaller diff might be considered if
there's doubt regarding correctness.

> > And in that vein, I'm not sure why the unwind-protect was removed.
>
> AFAICT it's redundant because let always unwinds its temporary bindings,
> in contrast with the previous add-function and setq which make permanent
> modifications that require manual unwinding.

Ah... makes sense to me now, thanks for the clarification..