[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?
From: |
Stefan Kangas |
Subject: |
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jul 2022 12:47:42 +0200 |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> run-dig seems to be able to guess the host using
> net-utils-machine-at-point, something 'dig' doesn't. So if we want to
> tell people top use the latter, IMO we should teach 'dig' that trick.
net-utils-machine-at-point does not seem very useful to me (it seems
to pick up any word whether or not it looks like a domain name?), but
perhaps we could use thing-at-point instead?
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Robert Pluim, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?,
Stefan Kangas <=
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07