[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jul 2022 16:33:56 +0200 |
>>>>> On Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:27:52 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
>>>>> said:
Lars> Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com> writes:
>> For extra credit, add a ʼserverʼ arg to a wrapper around `dns-query',
>> and obsolete `dig' as well.
Lars> dns.el requires UDP, I think, so it wouldn't work on Windows? (Nor
all
Lars> DNS servers support TCP.)
It falls back to TCP on windows, so yes, it would not work with the
small minority of servers that donʼt support TCP.
All we need is Someone™ to fix UDP support on Windows.
Robert
--
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Robert Pluim, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/07/07
- bug#56432: run-dig vs dig -- do we need both?, Stefan Kangas, 2022/07/07