|
From: | Gregory Heytings |
Subject: | bug#60467: 30.0.50; primitive-undo: Changes to be undone by function different from announced |
Date: | Tue, 03 Jan 2023 15:29:26 +0000 |
What would go wrong if we applied a patch like the one below?
With that patch, the "combine-change-calls: buffer-undo-list broken" message would be displayed with the recipe of this bug report. And timestamp entries would be added to what is "body-undo-list" in my patch. It's not clear to me that this could cause problems, but I guess it's safer to not include them, given that they were never included, and that the intention of the original code was to exclude them.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |