[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#60555: 29.0.50; Some clarification is needed about "smaller" and "la
From: |
Daniel Martín |
Subject: |
bug#60555: 29.0.50; Some clarification is needed about "smaller" and "larger" Tree-sitter nodes |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jan 2023 12:38:11 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (darwin) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> My main confusion happened after reading this sentence:
>>
>> We talk about a node being “smaller” or “larger”, and “lower” or
>> “higher”.
>>
>> That made me think there are two different dimensions we classify nodes:
>> "Size", that is, if the node is small or large, and "height", that is,
>> if it is low or high. I was hoping to learn the differences between
>> "size" and "height" in the rest of the text, but the text didn't make it
>> clear to me because it only talks about "smaller and lower" and "larger
>> and higher". What about "smaller and higher", or "larger and lower"?
>> Are they possible at all? After reading everything, I got the idea that
>> the terms may actually be synonyms, but I was not 100% sure. I feel we
>> could make this more clear from the start.
>>
>> All of this is my perspective as a non-native English speaker. Hope
>> this helps.
>
> Thanks, I've now reworded that text, please take a look.
Thanks, the text is now clearer to me. I'm closing the bug.