bug#60623: 30.0.50; Add forward-sentence with tree sitter support

[Theodor Thornhill]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>>>> +* Moving by Sentences:: Commands to move over certain definitions in code.
>>>                                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^
>>> I'd use "code units" or "units of code" here.
>>
>> Done.
>>
>>>
>>> Also, should we perhaps name the section "Moving by Statements"? or
>>> would it be too inaccurate?
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure.  I think that maybe because the commands involved, and the
>> ones that implicitly will be impacted, such as kill-sentence and friends
>> it is best to stay with Sentences?  But a statement is the better term
>> wrt programming languages of course.  I hold no strong opinions here.
>
> FWIW, while it may correspond to "statements" for some languages, it
> will correspond to other things in other languages (e.g. those that
> don't have a notion of "statement"), so it's probably best to stick to
> "sentence" here and then in the doc explain how that notion is expected
> to be mapped to notions that make sense for a given language.
>
>
>         Stefan


Yeah, that makes sense.

Theo