[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
Subject: |
bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jan 2023 20:13:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Lars Ingebrigtsen [2021-07-19 18:23 +0200] wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> More to the point: since this attribute of a buffer cannot be changed
>> once the buffer is created, I think it might be okay to copy from the
>> base buffer, but we should also allow the caller to control that by
>> introducing an optional argument similar to that of get-buffer-create.
>> And if we do that, we could also consider making the default value be
>> nil, not necessarily a copy of that of the base buffer.
>
> I've now applied Dick's patch, and then adjusted as you suggest.
Fmake_indirect_buffer continues to run buffer-list-update-hook
regardless of the new argument. Any objections to changing that?
0001-Fix-buffer-list-update-hook-for-indirect-buffers.patch
Description: Text Data
Thanks,
--
Basil
- bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks,
Basil L. Contovounesios <=
- bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/11
- bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2023/01/11
- bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/12
- bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks, Stefan Monnier, 2023/01/12
- bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/01/14
- bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks, Stefan Monnier, 2023/01/14
- bug#49160: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Uninitialized inhibit_buffer_hooks, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2023/01/17