3. What are the "rules"?
In c-mode, elisp-mode without paredit forward-sexp won't jump out of
the current scope, however with paredit enabled it will.
If we simply want some code similar to this to live and slowly evolve I
guess we can install something like this patch after some tweaks and
iterate when we have more experience.
The problem with that patch is -- and caveat, I do not use Java, so I
am not too versed in the details of the note types used -- but most of
the things I see are things that a normal sexp would work with anyway:
- true, false: they are just words, right?
- identifier: presumably a symbol or something that a decent syntax
table would probably catch.
- parenthesized_expression: delimited by ( ), etc. ? Sexp handles that
- just fine.
- argument_list: presumably uses ( ) also