bug-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#60691: 29.0.60; Slow tree-sitter font-lock in ruby-ts-mode


From: Yuan Fu
Subject: bug#60691: 29.0.60; Slow tree-sitter font-lock in ruby-ts-mode
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 14:24:28 -0800


> On Jan 19, 2023, at 10:28 AM, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
> 
> Hi Yuan,
> 
> On 18/01/2023 08:50, Yuan Fu wrote:
>>>>> Should treesit--font-lock-fast-mode be locally bound inside that
>>>>> function, so that it's reset between chunks? Or maybe the condition
>>>>> for its enabling should be tweaked? E.g. I don't think there are any
>>>>> particularly large or deep nodes in ruby.rb's parse tree. It's a
>>>>> very shallow file.
>>> 
>>> Yeah that is a not-very-clever hack. I’ve got an idea: I can add a C
>>> function that checks the maximum depth of a parse tree and the maximum
>>> node span, and turn on the fast-mode if the depth is too large or a node
>>> is too wide. And we do that check once before doing any fontification.
>>> 
>>> I’ll report back once I add it.
>> I wrote that function. But I didn’t end up using it. Instead I added a
>> "grace count", so that the query time has to be longer than the
>> threshold 5 times before we switch on the fast mode instead of 1.
>> My main worry is that simply looking at the parse tree would not catch
>> all the case where there will be expensive queries.
> 
> That might be true, but a criterion that doesn't specify conditions exactly 
> can give no guarantee against false positives.

The condition is “query is (consistently) slow”, that’s why I thought measuring 
the time is the most direct way.

> 
>> Could you try the latest commit and see if the fast mode still switches
>> on when it shouldn’t?
> 
> At first it seemed to help, but then I switched the major mode a couple more 
> times, and ran the benchmark twice more, and the "fast mode" switched on 
> again.
> 
> Which seems to make sense: there is no resetting the counter, right?
> 
> So if previously it happened once somehow during a certain scenario, now I 
> have to repeat the same scenario 4 times, and the condition is met.

I was hoping that the scenario only happen once, oh well :-) I’ll change the 
decision based on analyzing the tree’s dimension: too deep or too wide 
activates the fast mode. Let’s see how it works.

Yuan






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]