[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61490: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#61490: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768 |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 18:02:09 +0100 |
>>>>> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:48:35 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov
>>>>> <hi-angel@yandex.ru> said:
>> Procedural nit: if you put the bug number in the commit message rather
>> than the Subject, then 'git am' will strip the [PATCH v2] prefix for
>> us.
Konstantin> I am not sure I understood. I did not put the bug number in the
subject at all,
Konstantin> it is probably done by debbugs. E.g. if you look at this v2
patch in a browser
Konstantin> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=61490#20 the
"Subject" line
Konstantin> displayed there does not contain a bug number.
Youʼre right, this was because I was reading the report via
debbugs-gnus, which adds the prefix. Sorry about that, although this
is one reason why attaching patches is sometimes better.
Konstantin> I can add a bug number to the body the next time, but I'm not
sure it would make
Konstantin> debbugs stop adding the prefix.
It was debbugs-gnus, not debbugs, so putting it in the body is fine.
Robert
--
- bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, (continued)
bug#61490: [PATCH 0/1] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 2¹â°to 2¹âµ, Richard Stallman, 2023/02/16
bug#61490: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/16