[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to b
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Feb 2023 12:47:55 +0000 |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 8:24 AM Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 at 18:19, João Távora wrote:
>
> > The 'flex' completion style isn't really doing (or at shouldn't be doing)
> > what it does normally. Its purpose in Eglot is only to allow for flex-style
> > fontification of the pattern to happen. Nothing more, and that includes
> > no sorting.
>
> What happens with the “glorified TAGS” kind of servers that do no
> filtering on their side? Apparently those exists, according to the
> Github discussion I linked in the other message.
I think these servers do some kind of filtering. As "glorified TAGS"
servers they might not be aware of the local context but I presume
they would still _not_ provide the 'fooey' completion if point is
after the characters 'bar'. As to whether they also provide 'bias-rate'
in that case (a so-called flex-match) or just 'barbaz' (a prefix match),
it's completely up to them.
Regardless, there is nothing flex can or should do here, except --
as I mentioned -- guessing how the pattern should be painted on
the completions.
João
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, (continued)
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, João Távora, 2023/02/19
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2023/02/19
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/19
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, Stefan Monnier, 2023/02/19
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, João Távora, 2023/02/19
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, Stefan Monnier, 2023/02/19
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, Theodor Thornhill, 2023/02/19
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, Stefan Monnier, 2023/02/19
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, Augusto Stoffel, 2023/02/21
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, Augusto Stoffel, 2023/02/21
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list,
João Távora <=
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, Augusto Stoffel, 2023/02/21
- bug#61532: 30.0.50; [PATCH]: Make completions without sortText fall to back of the list, João Távora, 2023/02/21