bug#61655: [Tree sitter] [Feature Request] font-lock function calls, definitions, separately

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Cc: 61655@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 23:38:04 +0200
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>
> 
> On 22/02/2023 22:45, Yuan Fu wrote:
> > Yeah that’s just an idea, and I don’t have problem adding faces. But we 
> > probably can’t keep adding more and more specific faces. At one point we’ll 
> > need to either add indirection, or ask users to just add their own 
> > fontification rules, if it is really specific. We’ll see.
> 
> An indirection seems like a separate new feature. Might be useful for 
> some, but probably unnecessary for this discussion.
> 
> > Function definition & call is totally reasonable. But adapting all the 
> > major modes to use them is might be too big a change for emacs-29.
> 
> The change itself should be very straightforward. If we agree on the set 
> of faces (for variables and properties as well, right?), I don't mind 
> posting a patch for review.
> 
> Whether it gets accepted or not.

I'm okay with adding a few more faces to emacs-29, but please hurry,
as we don't have too much time for more additions.