[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 10
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768 |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2023 11:50:43 +0100 |
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:41:34 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
>> Cc: 61489@debbugs.gnu.org, 61490@debbugs.gnu.org
>> From: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>
>> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:53:02 +0300
>>
>> On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 16:49 +0100, Robert Pluim wrote:
>> > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 18:30:00 +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov
>> > > > > > > <hi-angel@yandex.ru> said:
>> >
>> > Konstantin> So, it's been a week since version 2 was posted and
10-11 days
>> > since I started
>> > Konstantin> using the change locally. Everything has been nice and
dandy,
>> > and in absence of
>> > Konstantin> further comments, I wonder if somebody with write
permissions
>> > could merge this
>> > Konstantin> patch?
>> >
>> > Iʼve had no issues with it. Eli? Does this require
'Copyright-paperwork-
>> > exempt: yes'?
>>
>> No, I have a copyright assignment with GNU for Emacs, it's just that I
don't write permissions :)
Eli> Sorry, you are right. Ignore my previous message where I said the
Eli> Copyright-paperwork-exempt thingy is necessary.
OK, Iʼve merged the two bugs. I can push whenever you deem itʼs ready.
Robert
--
- bug#61489: Open a bug report with git-send-email (was: bug#61489: Acknowledgement ([PATCH 1/1] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 2¹⁰to 2¹⁵)), (continued)
- bug#61489: [PATCH 1/1] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 2¹⁰to 2¹⁵, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/02/13
- bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/16
- bug#61490: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/23
- bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/23
- bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/23
- bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/23
- bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/23
- bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Robert Pluim, 2023/02/23
- bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/23
- bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768,
Robert Pluim <=
- bug#61489: bug#61490: bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/27
- bug#61489: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/02/23
Message not available
bug#61490: [PATCH 0/1] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 2¹â°to 2¹âµ, Richard Stallman, 2023/02/16
bug#61490: [PATCH v2] Increase BLOCK_ALIGN from 1024 to 32768, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2023/02/16